2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 7 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 524 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Tonka | XK |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2600 mm |
