2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Ford | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Tonka | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2636 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2740 mm |
