2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Tonka (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 18 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 668 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tonka | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 146 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2700 mm |