2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Tonka (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (104 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka should accelerate faster than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 443 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 563 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tonka | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 4093 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2850 mm |
