2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 178 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tonka | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2760 mm |