2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1990 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford Tonka has automatic transmission and 1990 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1990 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Tonka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 1990 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tonka | 626 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2520 mm |