2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Tonka | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
