2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1998 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 128 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda CR-V weights approximately 198 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 634 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 1998 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Tonka | CR-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 814 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2620 mm |