2002 Ford Tonka vs. 1999 Holden Vectra
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Vectra would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Holden Vectra (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Holden Vectra should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 2 kg more than 1999 Holden Vectra.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Holden Vectra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 614 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Vectra. (200 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Vectra.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 1999 Holden Vectra | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tonka | Vectra |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2650 mm |