2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 592 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford Tonka has automatic transmission and 2000 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Tonka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tonka | Minica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2350 mm |
