2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2006 Holden Captiva
To start off, 2006 Holden Captiva is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Captiva (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Captiva. (542 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 2006 Holden Captiva | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tonka | Captiva |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1760 mm |