2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 332 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Tonka | E-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 475 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 12 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 3510 mm |