2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (158 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 564 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Tonka | TT |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2469 mm |
