2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche (307 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche. (335 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Tonka | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 307 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 335 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 3310 mm |