2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 597 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. (217 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tonka | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2852 mm |
