2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 7 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Suzuki Equator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (381 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Tonka | Equator |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 3200 mm |