2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2013 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 300 (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 746 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chrysler 300. (534 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Tonka | 2013 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | Tonka | 300 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 358 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 534 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 5044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 3052 mm |