2002 Ford Tonka vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Juke (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 139 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 574 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Tonka | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Tonka | Juke |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1441 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6150 mm | 4125 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2370 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4200 mm | 2530 mm |
