2002 GMC Sierra vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 GMC Sierra (321 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 2002 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 GMC Sierra (371 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2002 GMC Sierra | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | 5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 371 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |