2002 GMC Sierra vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 GMC Sierra (321 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2011 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2011 Jaguar XF.
Because 2002 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 GMC Sierra. (371 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2002 GMC Sierra | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | GMC | Jaguar |
Model | Sierra | XF |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 371 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 70 L |