2002 GMC Terra 4 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 GMC Terra 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 GMC Terra 4 would be higher.
Because 2002 GMC Terra 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 GMC Terra 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 GMC Terra 4 has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 GMC Terra 4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 GMC Terra 4 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Terra 4 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2490 mm |
