2002 GMC Terra 4 vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 GMC Terra 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 GMC Terra 4 would be higher.
Because 2002 GMC Terra 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 GMC Terra 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 GMC Terra 4 | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | GMC | Audi |
| Model | Terra 4 | TT |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2469 mm |
