2002 GMC Terra 4 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 GMC Terra 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 GMC Terra 4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 36 kg more than 2002 GMC Terra 4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 GMC Terra 4 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | GMC | Toyota |
Model | Terra 4 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2270 kg | 2306 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3700 mm |