2002 Holden Barina vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2002 Holden Barina is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Barina (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 972 kg more than 2002 Holden Barina.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Barina | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Holden | Humber |
| Model | Barina | Pullman |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3330 mm |
