2002 Holden Barina vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Holden Barina is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Barina (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Barina (165 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Barina | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Barina | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2540 mm |