2002 Holden Barina vs. 1964 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2002 Holden Barina is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Barina (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Pontiac Tempest. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1964 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 290 kg more than 2002 Holden Barina.
Because 1964 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Barina | 1964 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Holden | Pontiac |
| Model | Barina | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2930 mm |
