2002 Holden Barina vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 2002 Holden Barina is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Barina (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Barina weights approximately 55 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden Barina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Barina (165 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2002 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Barina | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Barina | Racoon |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2770 mm |
