2002 Holden Barina vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2002 Holden Barina. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Barina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 575 kg more than 2002 Holden Barina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Barina. (165 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Barina.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Holden Barina 2010 Cadillac BLS
Make Holden Cadillac
Model Barina BLS
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 4600 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1060 kg 1635 kg
Vehicle Length 3820 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2680 mm