2002 Holden Berlina vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Berlina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Berlina would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden Berlina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Berlina (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Berlina should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Because 2002 Holden Berlina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden Berlina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Berlina (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Berlina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Berlina | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Berlina | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2480 mm |