2002 Holden Cruze vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Cruze. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Cruze would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1555 kg more than 2002 Holden Cruze.
Because 2002 Holden Cruze is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Cruze will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Cruze | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Holden | Fisker |
| Model | Cruze | Karma |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3160 mm |
