2002 Holden Frontera vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Frontera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Frontera would be higher. At 3,164 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden Frontera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Frontera (202 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Frontera should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2002 Holden Frontera is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Frontera will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Frontera (290 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Frontera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Frontera | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Frontera | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3164 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2601 mm |