2002 Holden HSV vs. 1962 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 567 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden HSV | 1962 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | HSV | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 125 Nm |
Top Speed | 263 km/hour | 140 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |