2002 Holden HSV vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden HSV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden HSV | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | HSV | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 306 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |