2002 Holden HSV vs. 2005 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2005 Isuzu KB is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Isuzu KB. 2005 Isuzu KB has automatic transmission and 2002 Holden HSV has manual transmission. 2002 Holden HSV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Isuzu KB will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden HSV | 2005 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Holden | Isuzu |
| Model | HSV | KB |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 2998 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 692 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
