2002 Holden HSV vs. 2007 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt. (210 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden HSV | 2007 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | HSV | Colt |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1467 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 210 Nm |
Top Speed | 263 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |