2002 Holden HSV vs. 2010 Zenvo ST1
To start off, 2010 Zenvo ST1 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden HSV would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Zenvo ST1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Zenvo ST1 (1,430 Nm) has 738 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden HSV. (692 Nm). This means 2010 Zenvo ST1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden HSV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden HSV | 2010 Zenvo ST1 | |
| Make | Holden | Zenvo |
| Model | HSV | ST1 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1104 HP |
| Torque | 692 Nm | 1430 Nm |
| Top Speed | 263 km/hour | 375 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
