2002 Holden HSV vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden HSV would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden HSV. (692 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden HSV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden HSV | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | HSV | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Torque | 692 Nm | 746 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
