2002 Holden HSV vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden HSV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC60. (441 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden HSV | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | HSV | XC60 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 692 Nm | 441 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |