2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2002 Holden Jackaroo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Jackaroo (158 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Jackaroo should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 1248 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Jackaroo (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Jackaroo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Jackaroo | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Holden | Reliant |
| Model | Jackaroo | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 333 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 797 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2290 mm |
