2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 685 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (158 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 965 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 657 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Holden | Lotec |
| Model | Jackaroo | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 5499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 333 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1150 mm |
