2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 2,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (158 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 560 kg more than 2004 MG ZT.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Jackaroo (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Jackaroo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2004 MG ZT | |
| Make | Holden | MG |
| Model | Jackaroo | ZT |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 333 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
