2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 2,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (169 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (158 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 785 kg more than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Jackaroo | E |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2148 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 333 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2860 mm |