2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2010 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2010 Lotus Elise is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lotus Elise (405 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (212 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 39 kg more than 2010 Lotus Elise.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lotus Elise (459 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Lotus Elise will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2010 Lotus Elise | |
| Make | Holden | Lotus |
| Model | Jackaroo | Elise |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 405 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7100 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 459 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1881 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4882 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1915 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1354 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2941 mm |
