2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (212 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 142 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (372 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | Jackaroo | CTS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2880 mm |
