2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 2,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (158 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 265 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Jackaroo (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Jackaroo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
Model | Jackaroo | Equinox |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 333 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2857 mm |