2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (212 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 98 kg more than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Holden | Dodge |
| Model | Jackaroo | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 365 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 536 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 2018 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3052 mm |
