2002 Holden UTE vs. 1969 Renault 8
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1969 Renault 8. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 714 kg more than 1969 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden UTE | 1969 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | UTE | 8 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 786 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2270 mm |
