2002 Holden UTE vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 645 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden UTE | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Holden | Zastava |
| Model | UTE | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2010 mm |
