2002 Holden UTE vs. 1986 Ford Tempo

To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 395 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications: