2002 Holden UTE vs. 1995 Honda NSX
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Honda NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Honda NSX would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Honda NSX (280 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Honda NSX should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 120 kg more than 1995 Honda NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Honda NSX. (294 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Honda NSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden UTE | 1995 Honda NSX | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | UTE | NSX |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2977 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7300 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2540 mm |